BREAKING: Former head of the Congressional Black Caucus hates black people!

Yes, that's right - this just in, Mel Watts, the former head of the Congressional Black Caucus, is backing a candidate who hates black people! And what's worse - a billion, trillion, kazillion times worse - he's doing so by making the exact same obviously, blatantly, self-evidently (that's why no other evidence is needed!) racist electability-based argument! The shock! The horror! The humanity!

I mean, how could anyone conceivably doubt the truth of this depiction of Edwards' electability argument as racist when it comes from the fine folks at ABC News, who have never once engaged in blatant water-carrying for the Radical Right in attacking Democrats in their entire illustrious careers as defenders of Truth, Justice, and the American Way? And it's not as if there's anything else that might detract from their credibility on this, like a previously-stated desire by members of the media and ABC News in particular to "bury" John Edwards. I mean, that's what makes all those people trying to argue that the claims that Edwards is more electable are objectively true so obviously wrong! How can you people be so blind as to continue to pay attention to mere facts when our benevolent corporate overlords, who have never once led us astray, have spoken? It's madness, people! Sheer madness!

And that, my friends, is why I've decided to cast my forlorn days as an Edwards supporter behind, and come to the light and glory that is Hillary - a candidate who really knows how to represent real Americans. Please... won't you join me?



Display:


re; hates black people! (2.00 / 1)

Hate to see you go, just think you could have been with a winner.


Change, is not a slogan on a podium.
by geauxjo on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 04:24:10 AM EST

Re: BREAKING: Former head of the Congressional Bla (2.00 / 1)

This whole Edwards is a racist bullshit has to end. We have heard quite enough of it.


If it's good enough for Joey it's good enough for Hillary! Like two peas in a pod.
by Hillary Lieberman on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 05:41:50 AM EST

There's no way its going anywhere. (2.00 / 1)

On the issues, large numbers of blacks have quite a lot to hope for from an Edwards presidency, so while Senators Obama and Hillary fight over "the black vote", there remains a common political need to keep black voters ... and most especially rural black voters in South Carolina ... from considering Edwards in terms of the issues.


*John Edwards* ... and the JE08 Supporters Blog
by BruceMcF on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 06:23:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BREAKING: (1.33 / 3)

Edwards has known for awhile people have questioned this type of campaigning from him as having racial overtones and he has continued to do it, regardless, and has continued to keep it vague when he knew what people were thinking it was about.  Stop blaming everyone else for his mistakes which is where the responsibility belongs.


by reasonwarrior on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 06:43:33 AM EST

Re: BREAKING: (1.00 / 1)

That's a very Republican argument.  "It's your fault for making us attack you!"


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 07:58:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Dang! Now you've gone and done it! (none / 0)

I've gotta choose. Let's see....

A white guy from the south with policies that works for everyone, whether, you're black, white, or blue and can WIN BIG

or

A polarizing, say nothing, manipulative white woman with criminal friends in high places who can LOSE.

Hmmmmm.....


It's an election, not an auction.
by cosbo on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 08:25:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dang! Now you've gone and done it! (none / 0)

Or,

A real progressive candidate that doesn't "pretend" he cares about ALL Americans, but demonstrates it with his record and deeds........

Hmmmmm


"I don't oppose all wars...what I do oppose, is a dumb war" ~ Barack Obama
by BlueDiamond on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 08:42:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yep, Edwards does care about all.... (none / 0)

Americans as demonstrated by his records & deeds.


It's an election, not an auction.
by cosbo on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 09:44:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Realism is not Racism (1.33 / 3)

I generally think policy proposals should trump electability, and I know Edwards is leading policy-wise, but let's get into electability.

Edwards saying he is more electable in a country where race is an issue doesn't make him a racist, but a realist. I have NO DOUBT in my heart John believes all people to be equal, but I know and he knows there's a reason why black politicians usually have better poll numbers than election results in non-black districts.

His race and gender may be a part of his superior electability, but it's not all there is to it.

He's better with people, both face to face and towards large audiences.

He's a better speaker.

He's better looking.

He has the right campaign staff (no mobsters or union-busters). Joe Trippi and especially David Bonior long proved their allegiance to the working people of America.

He puts his money where his mouth is concerning campaign finance.

He has the right background: Small town, working class, and it doesn't hurt he's from the South.

Elizabeth may prove to be a real asset, whereas Michelle is just a wife, and Bill is a liability.
(NAFTA, PNTR with China, Welfare reform, etc.)

His rhetoric strikes a chord with the people, whereas Hillary fakes a dialect, and Obama's audacity of hope begins to ring hollow, for lack of substance.

Edwards has by far the strongest backing of American labor, including unions like the SEIU, which organizes hundreds of thousands of African-Americans.(Did you see all the black JRE supporters at the SEIU summit, making a lot of noise for him? Think they're stupid? Or don't like blacks?)

The whole idea to paint Edwards as a racist is a sign of desperation among Hillary-supporters.


"The way to win a Presidential race against the Republicans is to develop the class warfare issue..." Lee Atwater, Bush `88 campaign manager.
by aufklaerer on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 07:25:01 AM EST

Re: Realism is not Racism (2.00 / 2)

you whole post is appalling and you don't even know it and you have the nerve to troll rate other people?

ABO... Anybody but Obama. I LIKE the democratic party.

by MollieBradford on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 08:30:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Once Again (none / 0)

Edwards supporters thinking they know more about the Black Community than the Black Community.

Mel Watts is a discrace and an embarrassment to the Black Community. Perhalps, candidates should check these thing out before going around celebrating their "I Gots Me A Black One Dis Tyme!" endorsements. It only helps if they are actually embraced by the Black Community. Unless of course, that's NOT the aim. Then, well, why make a big fuss over an endorsement from a Black guy?

Snip From Black Agenda Report:  

R.I.P. Rep. Mel Watt

"We come to not praise Mel, but to bury him."

by Leutisha Stills

In looking back at how the Congressional Black Caucus has operated in the last two years, we at CBC Monitor, have not come to praise Congressman Mel Watt's (D-NC), leadership, but to bury him in his performance as Chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus for the past two years.

You can't really praise an individual's leadership when they consistently subverted it to do the will of House Minority Leader, Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), in the hopes of receiving favorable treatment from her.  Watt's obsequious relationship with Pelosi negatively impacted everything the CBC attempted to do as a Caucus, and rendered them virtually ineffective.

The fact that the CBC is as ineffective as Mel Gibson's apology for his anti-Semitic remarks, was not lost on individuals attending this year's CBC Legislative Weekend.  It was reported to CBC Monitor by reliable sources on Capitol Hill that attendance at this year's conference was down by an estimated 15,000 people.  Well, people get tired of attending events, using their own money, vacation time and travel, to listen to elected officials talk loud and say nothing, as well as do talk loud and do nothing.

"Watt's obsequious relationship with Pelosi negatively impacted everything the CBC attempted to do as a Caucus."

Mel Watt deserves all the ridicule, scorn and derision we can hurl upon him, for his decided lack of leadership and a woeful unwillingness to call out any renegade CBC member for voting the corporate interests that serve to decimate the majority Black districts they represent, in the name of maintaining unanimity. Even when his own colleagues made the customary laudable speeches, praising his leadership, one got the sense that they really didn't mean what they said.

His repeated capitulation to House Minority Leader Pelosi, one assumes, is in the hope that he positions himself well for a plum committee assignment, should the Democrats take back Congress in November, by holding himself out to Pelosi as being a "good, non-threatening Negro," while selling out his own Caucus, even though he always voted in such a way that earned him a position on the Honor Roll since we began publishing the Report Card.

Well, for his trouble to attempt to maintain unanimity, as well as subverting the CBC's own political agenda (if they ever had one) to stay in Pelosi's good graces, those who relied on the CBC being the "Conscience of the Congress" got the following results of Black Leadership for their reliance:
20 CBC members were scrubbed off the list of lawmakers who sponsored legislation to renew provisions of the Voting Rights Act, because Pelosi, in code words, deemed the bill "too Black," and was afraid she wouldn't be able to get the reich-wing bigots in the GOP to sign off on it. The isolation of, and slinging under the bus of one of their own members (Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-GA), for crying out about corruption in the Bush Administration, as well as being subjecting to racial profiling by the Capitol Hill Police, while circling the wagons to protect a member of the CBC who was so corrupt in the selling of his office that he has the moniker of "Dollar Bill," and is currently under a Federal indictment for bribery (Rep. William Jefferson, D-LA). We believe the CBC's willingness to follow Pelosi's orders and isolate McKinney may have played a direct role in her primary loss this past August. We know that their circling the wagons around Jefferson has cost the Caucus in terms of credibility among many progressive organizations, especially when, instead of taking action to handle the Jefferson matter themselves, they waited until Pelosi took the action of removing Jefferson from his committee assignments and then they cried "Foul" and implied that Pelosi's actions were racially motivated.

They probably were, but the CBC leadership did not have to abdicate personal responsibility in calling out one of their own for ethics violations and corruption of their office.  We would expect the CBC to be as vigilant about their own members as they are about the system of Checks and Balances in the Federal Government.

"Watt provided derelict Black members cover in their duty as lawmakers."
The failure to publicly censure CBC members who voted for anti-people legislation (such as the Bankruptcy bill; Net Neutrality, Estate Tax Repeal, Border Protection Act, Authorization of Iraq War, etc), when the sense of the majority of the Caucus (better than 60%) was against such legislation and voted accordingly. In excusing the votes of the renegade members, Watt provided them cover to be derelict in their duty as lawmakers, while publicly chastising organizations such as CBC Monitor, for daring to publish Report Cards highlighting such dereliction.

There are many examples of Mel Watt's dereliction as a leader of the CBC, which we have expanded on in several issues of the Black Commentator, so there is no need to do anymore than write Mr. Watt's obituary on his tenure as CBC Chairman.  His obituary, from our standpoint, is brief:

He often voted correctly,

But when it came to matters of importance, and holding the Caucus together as a Caucus, in leadership,

He was Missing In Action.

Rather than advance the Agenda of the Caucus he often sought to subvert it, at the directive of the House Minority Leader.

In so doing, and refusing to have the Caucus take positions on things that mattered, the Caucus was absent from any political position of importance.

Mel Watt threw away any bargaining chips the Caucus would have had, and rendered 41 House Members and 1 Senator as no more than bumbling fools on Capitol Hill.

In evaluating the leadership of Congressman Mel Watt as CBC Chair, we cannot praise him, we can only bury him.

SOURCE: BlackAgenda Report

http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=105&Itemid=42


"I don't oppose all wars...what I do oppose, is a dumb war" ~ Barack Obama
by BlueDiamond on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 08:35:11 AM EST

So....which is it? (none / 0)

Mel Watts is a traitor to his color?

or

Mel Watts is not black enough?


It's an election, not an auction.
by cosbo on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 09:52:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Mc Snatherson (none / 0)

Are we headed to Daily Kos next?

Should I meet you over there?


"I don't oppose all wars...what I do oppose, is a dumb war" ~ Barack Obama
by BlueDiamond on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 08:36:04 AM EST

No black community (2.00 / 2)

There is no such thing as the "black community." Honestly, I relate to very little of what goes for mainstream black politics these days. Many other blacks are in the same boat. I'm sick of having the so-called black agenda hijacked for a select group of black folks, and all in my name. Of course, this makes me out of touch with the black community to, ironically, many non-blacks who feel not one shred of discomfort in lecturing me about the needs of black people. If some black folks think a certain way or support a certain candidate, why must it be "black support" ? I'll tell you why, it's because liberals, just like conservatives, cling to a narrow conception of blackness. If you're not poor and downtrodden, then to these people, you're not really black--at least not the black folks that interest them. But the rest of black America is expected to sacrifice their identity to the needs of one segment of black America--why?

Indeed, unless you are a certain type of black, the Demcratic party has no need for you. How dare you people wax on about Black folks this and black folks that as if blacks are a singular breed. I know you people are smarter than this.


by NewNoir on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 09:51:36 AM EST

Re: BREAKING: Former head of the Congressional Bla (2.00 / 1)

This is a foolish diary. Thats all that needs to be said


by world dictator on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 12:00:20 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.